The Magic of the Cup

The Magic of the Cup

In days gone by the FA Cup Final was the curtain closing showcase end to the English football season. As a boy I’d wait excited all day by the television. Watching the teams arrive at the stadium in their special FA Cup suits. Later doing their special pitch walk. All of them looking relaxed but bubbling with the sense of the big occasion just like the fans watching. Winning the FA Cup may not have given a team bragging rights about being the best in the land but the desire on that day matched the league campaign. If a team managed the league and cup double it was a mark of excellence.
 
Nowadays the cup clubs want in their double, sometimes before the domestic league itself, is the Champions League. The prestige of the world’s greatest and oldest domestic cup now sits above the League Cup as a consolation prize or a good addition to the Premier League/Champions League double. It doesn’t take priority. Which is a shame. It doesn’t even get to be the closing game of the season due to Wembley staging the Champions League final this year. Over the years its value had been left to erode to the point the cause take its slot as the season closer.
 
There is a paradox in this, and I love a paradox. The chase of the Champions League dream and most recent English success came by way of Chelsea. They failed to finish in the top four that year but were crowned Kings of Europe. Back in the old European Cup format at least when teams like Liverpool had their successes they deserved that mantle without question. And the FA Cup still had its importance. Clubs chase the Champions League dream when on paper it should be the one devalued. Unless they’re chasing the cash flow of competitions regardless of other factors. I’d love to see the FA Cup winners be awarded a spot in the Champions League in place of the fourth placed Premier League side. Of course UEFA will never allow that but it’s one way to make the Cup illustrious again.
 
Despite the current state of the Cup compared to its former glory days, come final day it is the biggest game on Earth for the two teams. This year we’ll see Manchester City face Wigan Athletic. Both sets of fans appreciating the trip to compete like it was ten Champions League finals rolled into one. It wasn’t so long ago Manchester City dreamed of the current success they’re currently experiencing and Wigan probably started this season with the aim to avoid relegation. Neither will have enjoyed the league this year so the Cup provides a welcome distraction.
 
It’s more than just a distraction, though, they’ll both desire a win immensely. For Manchester City a season without something in their trophy cabinet will be seen as a massive failure. Whereas Wigan may well be thinking this could be their only chance for a long time to take some silverware. Even the managers’ futures could hang on the result. City’s Mancini could be given more time, as he deserves, should he take the FA Cup back to Manchester like he did a few years ago. Wigan’s Martinez on the other hand could be lured away if he wins a trophy with a small club.
 
The ramifications of success and defeat won’t be felt on the day. For that special time at Wembley the fans and players alike can be lured into the spell of the FA Cup and will willingly partake in the belief it’s the only game that’s mattered all season. If there’s any doubt whether or not this cup is craved look at the faces of the winners after the final whistle. The magic of the cup will be etched on every one of them. 

Believing in the wizardry of cinema again, for the first time

Believing in the wizardry of cinema again, for the first time
 
I often worry that today’s generation are growing up in a time where the arts and mainstream entertainment underwhelms. They have the ability to access, via the internet, a vast selection of movies and music that make exclusivity or anticipation a relative unknown. It’s the disposable times where being impressed means “that’s cool” rather than mouth agape wonder.
 
Toddlers are the last example we have amongst us of innocent wonderment. My Godson – like many little boys – was into Thomas the Tank Engine big time. When he took his first train journey the look of astonishment on his face was a joy to witness. He kept repeating over-and-over: “choo-choo Thomas.” He couldn’t believe he was on a train. I don’t think any gift or anything he’s witnessed since then took his breath away quite like that. Nowadays the wonder of an iPad is no different to him than switching on a light was for me back in the 80s.
A movie action sequence filled with realistic looking CGI doesn’t impress him, it’s what is expected. A new song may be pleasing to his ears but there’s no anticipation for the music video release, and once he’s bored of it, YouTube will play him something else within seconds. When I was his age (oh my, I have become that old man figure) the build-up to Michael Jackson’s Thriller created a buzz that was richly deserved once the film was seen for the first time. Every Sunday the Top 40 on the radio mattered. And if a movie pulled a special effect out the bag that even resembled reality people were impressed. More than that, they appreciated the efforts and applauded. We allowed our imaginations to fill in the blanks that couldn’t be created and blur the tricks that never quite worked correctly.
For the large part we often became like a boy on a train for the first time
 
The very first time I crossed the line from wonder to a world beyond my imagination was when I watched The Wizard of Oz as a little boy. It didn’t just impress me with its visuals – which did make my mouth drop open in surprise when the sepia tones were replaced with colour ones – it absorbed me entirely. I may as well have been Toto because I stepped into that world with Dorothy. I was kept there by the characters, proving that story should always come first, without depth we fail to remain engaged. There were darker elements, too. Those appealed to me. Hints that sprinkled across the light of Ozwithout losing the flavour that kept me gripped in the first place.
 
The Wizard of Oz was released at the end of the 30s, so in many ways it’s understandable that over time audiences require new ways to be amazed. It worked so effectively on me because even though as a kid in the 80s colour TV was the norm, all my movie experiences had come from my grandma’s house. And she liked to put on many a black and white flick. I remember the first that caught my attention was King Kong. I really felt for that hairy beast. My imagination didn’t see a puppet swatting away planes but a real, breathing animal that was confused and out of place. Oz smashed colour into my movie times with grandma which added to that magical transportation.
 
In the modern era technology has given us many new fads and phases. CGI of course is now an industry standard. It is used in ways we don’t even acknowledge with our eyes anymore. Since its early use we have gone from noticing bad CGI sequences that asked too much of early models to knowing it must be CGI because the scope of say, a large action sequence like the one in 2012, can’t be real. However, the new movie goers of today take such CGI laced films as a given. Much like we do with audio, never giving a thought to the silent movie era. It’s expected, not appreciated.
 
Movie companies will always look for new ways to sell us a better product. They tried 3D movies in the 80s and failed. But they didn’t abandon the concept. They waited. They waited until the technology was more viable, the effect more breathtaking. Except, even in its hyped return, it never took my breath away. The difference this time is the movie companies are determined to make the 3D movie stick. They see dollar signs. I just wanted to see signs it was worthwhile.
 
One technology I had jumped on board with from the start was IMAX. After seeing the opening rooftop sequence of The Dark Knight I went from liking it to believing every movie needed it. So when theatres started IMAX 3D showings I decided it was 3D’s last chance. Avatar had failed to grab me. The story I found to be weak (and remember, story is the backbone any fancy effects need) and the visuals themselves had me mouth open but with a yawn rather than amazement.
 
I’m a reasonable chap so I threw another chance to the 3D IMAX world and went to watch Prometheus. I did get a better sense of visual depth but I’d seen that used in promising fashion in the Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menance 3D version; I expected more from Ridley Scott and the Alien world. At this point I was certain there would never be a movie that would make me a believer. I just hoped over time the fad would fade and something worthy would replace it.
But I was wrong. There is a need for 3D. But only when used in conjunction with IMAX.
It’s poetic that the movie to make me see this was Oz The Great and Powerful. Any person that isn’t transformed into their childhood self during the sequence when Oz is in his weather balloon inside the tornado will never be impressed by anything on this earth again (or at least whilst sat in a cinema seat munching popcorn). The swishing sounds swallowed the senses that finally overloaded when his basket became repeatedly penetrated. The only way you’ll ever know what it’s like to be in a tornado is to find one and wait for it to take you.
 
The mouth stayed agape for a little while longer. When we see the Land of Oz for the first time it’s not just paying homage to the original film with the change from sepia to colour, it bursts into life making our normal everyday world appear blank and white. It’s like all the years before I’d seen a blurred colourless world that was suddenly replaced with HD and an infinite colour palette. And the depth. Such glorious depth. If I found the world’s best vantage point with a perfect pair of binoculars I wouldn’t see as far in comparison to the perceived texture of Oz.
 
Thanks to forums I have read criticisms of the film. Any that are not impressed with the effects I have assumed they watched a 2D version or a bad pirate copy. Or that they’re the sorts that are never impressed with anything. The doom merchants that try very hard to be overly gloomy. They’d be as quick to say an intelligent film is boring then say an easy going fun film is too simple. And make no mistake about it, Oz The Great and Powerful is supposed to be simple family fun. Some have been fast to praise the excellent (as always, it seems nowadays) Michelle Williams but claim the rest of the cast lack character development or engaging performances. I disagree.
 
In the title role James Franco delivers the performance in the best believable way. Grounding Oz with very earthly attributes. He isn’t supposed to be a knight in shining armour. He’s a flawed and selfish man from the start and had his transformation been too great it would have been the hardest piece of plausibility in the entire movie. Without giving away spoilers I’d say Mila Kunis had the hardest task throughout the course of the film, and whilst she never gave a Heath Ledger turn of redefining public perception of a character or making the movie hers, she certainly wasn’t lacking. Also it has to be remembered it was a film made for children. To expect more would be to drift away from the target audience.
 
It’s a shame that the plan Oz uses to take on the witches as the story draws to its end is symbolic of something we ourselves have become susceptible to. They’d lost belief in wonder like we have when it is used in our forms of escapism. Sami Raimi may well be the first director to fully extract the hidden potential of 3D when combined with IMAX and still deliver a complete movie. So it’s an even bigger shame we’re more likely to see James Cameron’s blue people again before Sam takes us back to Oz.